FBI Fix is IN shows need for Special Prosecutor

FBI Fix is IN: During a House investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private, unsecured email server during her tenure as secretary of State, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) ripped apart FBI Director James Comey Thursday morning for publicly stating there was a lack of sufficient evidence to prosecute the presumptive Democratic nominee.

GOWDY: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received classified information over her private e-mail. Was that true?

COMEY: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent —

GOWDY: So it was not true?

COMEY: That’s what I said.

GOWDY: OK. Well, I’m looking for a little shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long. Secretary Clinton said there was not marked classified on her e-mails either sent or received, was that true?

Clinton lied about classified emails

COMEY: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said ‘I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail, there is no classified material.’ Was that true?

Clinton lies about emailsCOMEY: There was classified material e-mail.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said she used just one device. Was that true?

COMEY: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of State.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said all work-related e-mails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?

The FBI fix is inCOMEY: No. We found work-related e-mails, thousands that were not returned.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work-related e-mails from her personal account. Was that true?

Clinton LIED about number of email devicesCOMEY: That’s a harder one to answer. We found traces of work related e-mails in — on devices or slack space, whether they were deleted or whether when a server was changed out something happened to them. There’s no doubt that the work-related e-mails that were removed electronically from the — the e-mail system.

Clinton LIED about all emails returnedGOWDY: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the e-mails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the e-mail content individually?

In a later exchange with Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) Comey said Clinton wasn’t sophisticated enough to understand what information was classified and what wasn’t.

“A question about sophistication came up earlier, whether she was sophisticated enough to understand what a ‘C’ means,” Comey said.

Meadows shot back: “You’re saying the former secretary of State is not sophisticated enough to understand a classified marking?”

“That’s not what I said,” Comey said. “I think it’s possible, possible, she didn’t understand what a ‘C’ meant when she saw it in the body of the e-mail like that.”

In light of the discrepancies between Clinton’s statements and the FBI’s findings, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) said the House committee investigating her email scandal plans to ask the federal agency to investigate the statements she made to the federal agency.

Comey explained the FBI Fix is IN investigation into Clinton’s emails did not include investigating whether her testimony was truthful because the agency needs a referral from Congress to investigate.

“You’ll have one,” Chaffetz said. “You’ll have one in the next few hours.”

Source: Link>>>


  • LM

    I been telling you…….. The FIX was in. Comey is crooked. The FIX was in with Obama, Lynch and Bill, Hillary…..and Comey. We could assume that below the surface there are some agents PO’d about the FIX after they worked so hard form many months gathering evidence…… but they are officially/formally sworn and signed to secrecy by Comey under penalty of prosecution……. they can’t talk.

    There is no other explanation than FIX when you see Comey’s indictment speech that then ended with no referral to DOJ for indictment, charges, grand jury, trial. You know it when it comes out that HRC “interview” with FBI after months of investigation and gathering evidence, emails, etc. was not under oath, not transcribed or recorded……just a 302 Form which is managed by the fixers in order to say what is required. (I think it is virtually unprecedented that the subject of in investigation, the subject mind you, is invited to testify….er….”interview” and is not put under oath and no court stenographer or recording to transcribe is done. Crazy, crazy.)

    They are corrupted. It was a FIX. We can hope that it is blown wide open somehow as info can’t be contained and comes out. Probably will not change the partisan political opinions. -LM